Us and russia counterintelligence

Introduction

The Cold War epoch refers to a period of clip from 1945 to 1991 which was characterized by political animus, economic competition and military tenseness between two states which had emerged as the Earth ‘s chief world powers ; Russia and America. Nevertheless, it remains clear that the booby traps of Cold War had the universe bifurcated, so that Russia was ringed with provinces in Eastern Europe to organize the USSR, whereas the US was being supported by developed provinces in Western Europe. The provinces in the latter group were therefore known as Allies, while the former, the orbiter provinces.

At this clip, military, political, technological and economic espionage took the Centre phase so that the act was seen to infiltrate even the most secret spheres of societal life. There are multiple attestations of there being instances whereby twosomes romantically involved could hold one party transporting out politically or military espionage for the US, whilst the spouse is a Russian KGB agent.

Suffice it to advert, there are several similarities and differences which exist between the Russian and the US counterintelligence during the Cold War epoch. These similarities and differences are discussed forthwith, hereunder.

The Similarities Between Russian And The US Counterintelligence Programs During The Cold War

First off, it is of import to take stock of the fact that both American and Russian counterintelligence plans were thrust to their zenith by the demand to fix for war against the enemy cantonment and licking at all costs. To this consequence, both the US and the Russian intelligence and counterintelligence systems were systematized and extremely structured intelligence and security organisations.

To the consequence of the above, both Russian and American intelligence systems were being operated in a cloak-and-dagger mode. This close mode of the intelligence operations from both sides was underpinned by the demand for both sides to fix to contend the opposition.

To catalyse and to do the aggregation of classified information more dynamic, the Cold War epoch saw both America and Russia come up with a good structured and systematized organic structure which was to assist towards this same cause. Normally, it is the security and intelligence forces who were used towards these terminals. This saw security and intelligence forces, particularly the Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ) and the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti ( KGB ) play functions characterized by a heavy sense of dichotomy ( Bogle, 2001 ) .

While both the CIA ‘s and KGB ‘s aboriginal functions did bode the protection of the two states ‘ local security and involvements overseas, the demand to transport out Acts of the Apostless kindred to political and military espionage became more inevitable. The flood tide of this development saw these security and jurisprudence order outfits pervert into Dirty work, so as to weaken the cause of the opposition. In most instances, both the KGB and the CIA carried out these dirty works non straight against the opposition, but against the opposition ‘s involvements and Alliess.

As explained by Cimbala ( 2004 ) , the demand to widen the services of counterintelligence for both divides saw both the Russian and the American intelligence operations during the Cold War ; derive a more planetary than localized domain of operation. Similarly, the demand for a globalised attack was underpinned by the fact that as two centres of power, their involvements and Alliess were internationally distributed. In this wavelength, apart from the Satellite provinces, KGB intelligence had bases in Japan, China, Korea and Tokyo. The CIA on the other manus had bases throughout its ally states.

The expediency of transporting on with this expedition was premised on the fact that at times, Russia ‘s involvement and spouse would be juxtaposed to the US ; as exemplified by Cuba. In the same vena, America ‘s involvements and protagonists would be found stationed right within the precincts of the Communist USSR ‘s hotbed ; with West Germany functioning as an illustration.

For case, the Cold War epoch had the US counterintelligence organic structure, the CIA proliferating difficult drugs and substances into Cuba, as a manner of weakening the Cuban radical authorities. The fact of the affair is that by enfeebling the public through drug maltreatment and substance trust, it would be difficult for Fidel Castro ‘s authorities to transport out province involvements and ends which were non merely antithetical to the US ‘ , but besides friendly to Nikita Khrushchev ‘s directives and associations.

At the same clip, through the CIA, the US was able to contend and sometimes topple legitimate political governments as a manner of countering Russia and its influence. For illustration, it is through the same cause that America was able to subvert the Chilean autochthonous authorities of Salvador Allende and to enforce Agostino Pinochet over the people. Russia was besides non left behind in this exercising. The apogee of this matter is instead hot wars which were fought overseas ; peculiarly, in countries which were seen to hold the built-in authority to back up either US ‘ capitalist democratic or Russian socialist involvements as was seen in the Vietnam War.

In the above instance, the Vietnam War had the CIA supply the Southern Vietnam with weaponries, since Southern Vietnam was by default pro US involvements, by the virtuousness of opposing the Northern Vietnam which was Communist, and as such, identifiable with Russia ‘s involvements. The corollary to this was that the Russian counterintelligence outfit, the KGB was the main provider of the weaponries and military support to the Northern Vietnam ( Hulnick, 1999 ) .

Similarly, it is during this Cold War epoch, peculiarly in 1961 which saw the CIA facilitate an attempted putsch against Cuba and Castro in the Bay of Pigs. That both Russia and America were interested in garnering information surrounding on military promotion, is good seen in the fact that the bungled Bay of Pigs invasion had been propelled by the US counterintelligence ‘s probes and subsequent disclosure to the US authorities that Russia had promised publically, to publish Cuba with weaponries against the menace of America ( Sibley, 2004 ) .

Theoharis ( 1999 ) argues that it is besides of great worth, taking to stock, the forces runing under the auspices of the counterintelligence plans and organic structures were modified to function as the president ‘s interior circle of political and military advisers, vis-a-vis, the great political and military acumen these were seen to possess. In both instances, it is the CIA which advised the so American president, John F. Kennedy into the Bay of Pigs invasion, holding convinced him of the appraisal that he had merely 10 yearss before Cuba fired its Russia-supplied missiles at Florida.

On the other manus, the KGB consolidated its relevancy to Nikita Khrushchev, by traveling past the conventional attempts of supplying Russia with classified information, but besides by publishing consultative services and information touching on other states falling within the Satellite provinces. It is a good established fact that on the Eve of the Bay of Pigs invasion, it is the KGB agents who detected Washington D.C ‘s programs to transport out an assault on Cuba through the aid of the deposed anti Castro forces. It is these same agents who furnished both Moscow and Havana with inside informations on the at hand onslaught, its nature and the most effectual manner of countering this anti Castro moving ridge. It is besides a fact that it is the KGB agents who on 26th October 1964, shot down the US ‘ U2 Plane in Cuba ; this plane being the really one originally used by CIA functionaries to snap the Cuban atomic missile bases on October 14th, 1962 ( Gabrick and Klehr, 2000 ) .

In both instances and sides, the operations of both Russian and the US counterintelligence were both driven and centered on garnering information touching on military promotions, promotion in the country of scientific discipline and engineering and the opposing side ‘s purposes. To this consequence, an array of instruments became really of import for counterintelligence, every bit far as both the US and Russia in the Cold War were concerned. In an effort to delve deeper into each other, both the Soviet imperium and the US put to employment, the usage of undercover agents, deserters, dual agents and moles, so much so that disinformation and infiltration became really built-in parts of the art of counterintelligence.

The Differences Between Russian And The US Counterintelligence Programs During The Cold War

Wiebes ( 2001 ) explains that in most instances, it was non so difficult to see that the US counterintelligence and espionage plans were curtailed by the demand to keep political rightness. Whereas Russia was seeing even the Church as being an of import conduit for transporting out its counterintelligence efforts on one manus, the US remained committed to its ideals, taking to consolidate the topographic point of the Separation of the Church and State on the other manus. America thought that the assimilation of the Church into its counterintelligence plans would be a dispute of this above rule.

While the US shunned the usage of the Church for counterintelligence, through the Moscow Patriarchate which was set in topographic point as a KGB ‘s intelligence extremity by Joseph Stalin in 1943, Russia recognized the rule of Separation of the Church and State in merely a dejure sense, but non in a defacto sense. On the contrary, the US followed this rule both in paper and in actuality. It is on this history that it was non uncommon to happen Russian churches to a great extent taking portion in the spying activities. Although the US saw the demand to camouflage its counterintelligence with civilian facets, suchlike agreements were made but limited to single civilians and civic organic structures.

It besides remains limpid that US ‘ and Russia ‘s counterintelligence plans read their designs from different books, given the fact that: whereas the CIA remained answerable and accessory to the US authorities, KGB was ne’er restricted by Torahs within and outside Russia. On the contrary, the KGB remained unchecked within its place state to the consequence that it enjoyed a huge extent of monopoly over province power. That the KGB was bequeathed by Nikita Khrushchev ‘s disposal a really privileged place in Russia set precedency for this counterintelligence outfit to put to death its manoeuvres globally ( Murphy, 2009 ) .

However, a great sense of veracity remains extant in the impression that both US ‘ and Russia ‘s counterintelligence reached a planetary span. It is against this background that the US was seen to take earnestly the cause of the demand to hold both the unseeable and the seeable authoritiess. For America, the seeable authorities was to consist the readily ego attesting authorities and its forces both within and without the US boundary lines. The unseeable authorities consists of the CIA, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and all the clandestine American authorities betrayers runing in Diaspora, in favour of the US involvements. This was a reproduction of Russia ‘s flawlessness on its counterintelligence plans.

It is besides a good established fact that every bit pointed out by political scientists that although the form of counterintelligence were about similar across both divides, yet, the unequivocal point between the two is the degree of engagement into each other ‘s personal businesss. In this consequence, it is pointed out that Russia carried a greater extent of engagement in US ‘ personal businesss. This was to the consequence that even the American citizens were seen to at times become involved in Russian espionage. It is against this background that other historiographers such as Aid ( 2001 ) property America ‘s inanition or reserves towards full graduated table espionage and counterintelligence to the Great Depression which took topographic point in 1930s. Aid ( Ibid ) explains that this Great Economic Depression stifled the economic ability of the US during the station World War Two epoch to ease counterintelligence and espionage activities against Russia.

Decision

At the minute, it can still be said that there are still, the really clear traces of Cold War-like counterintelligence steps and Acts of the Apostless of political espionage on both sides. Though non being publically apparent, it is pointed out that by giving his acquiescence on May 17th, 2007 for Russian churches, peculiarly the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Of Russia to stay operational within the US ; the former US president George W. Bush gave a greater position for Russian political espionage. Johnson ( 2007 ) points out that a visit to idolize services delivered by these Russian churches in the US merely betrays an avenue where Russian-Americans together with their kids are indoctrinated with sentiments surrounding on the demand to keep trueness to Russia. Conversely, the September 11th 2001 made it evident to the universe in entireness the authority of the US to utilize its unseeable authorities in its war against terrorist act.

Mentions

Aid, M.M. ( 2001 ) . Secret Signals Intelligence during the Cold War and Beyond.

New York: Routledge.

Bogle, L.L. ( 2001 ) . The Cold War: Cold war Espionage and Spying.

Centennial state: Taylor & A ; Francis.

Cimbala, S. ( 2004 ) . Politicss of Warfare. Penn State Press.

Gabrick, R. and Klehr, H. ( 2000 ) . Communism, Espionage and the Cold War.

California: National Center for History in the Schools.

Hulnick, A.S. ( 1999 ) . Repairing the Spy Machine: Cooking the US Intelligence for the twenty-first Century. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Johnson, K. ( 2007 ) . Strategic Intelligence. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Murphy, D. et Al. ( 2009 ) . Battleground Berlin: CIA vs. KGB in the Cold War.

Yale University Press.

Sibley, A.K. ( 2004 ) . Red Spies in America: Stolen Secrets and the Dawn of the Cold War. Michigan: University of Michigan.

Theoharis, A.G. ( 1999 ) . The F.B.I: A Comprehensive Guide.

New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Wiebes, C. ( 2001 ) . Cold War: Secret Signals Intelligence. New York: John Wiley and Sons.