The Southern Fight And The Civil War History Essay

The American civil war that occurred during 1861 and 1865 can be vividly recalled by many citizens where the provinces had been divided against each other. This had threatened the United States of America with a split between the South and the North. Eleven southern provinces united to organize the Confederate States of America or the Confederacy and their leader was Jefferson Davis. The Confederate States of America waged war against the Union ( United States ) where bondage was already abolished and the five provinces referred to as the Border States ( Mcdonough, p.29 ) .

The run against the distributing out of bondage to other provinces that were non practising the frailty in 1860 sparked the civil war. The halt of enlargement was led by the so incoming President Abraham Lincoln and the surpassing James Buchman. The Confederate declared sequence from the larger USA ( the brotherhood ) before Lincoln was sworn on 4th March1861 ( Romaneck, & A ; Romaneck, p.38 ) . While the South was determined for a sequence the North viewed it as a rebellion and therefore the civil war.

Attacks by the Confederate States of America on the US military cantonments at South Carolina on 12th April 1861 were countered by military action from the North. The South and the north both had ground forcess that would go on in the civil war to the terminal. The emancipation announcement was a major flicker for more war since bondage would be brought to an terminal. Watkins in his book ‘Co. Aytch: A Confederate Memoir of the Civil War ‘ gives a clear history how the soldiers suffered during the civil war as he was among them and he fortunately survived. He says in the book ‘but I must squeal that I ne’er realized the “ gaudery and circumstance ” of the thing called glorious war until I saw this. Work force were lying in every imaginable place ; the dead lying with their eyes broad unfastened, the hurt beggary piteously for aid, and some beckoning their chapeaus and shouting to us to travel frontward ‘ ( Watkins, p.23 ) .

Lee had led many successful conflicts for the South but in 1863 there was a bend around where his onslaughts got his ground forces destroyed and the north managed to divide the Confederacy into two ; this continued even through 1864 and 1865 until the north won the civil war ( Watkins, p.28 ) .

Reason

Bondage

Watkins, p.37 quotation marks that “ I write these reminiscences of the war of sezession, rebellion, province rights, bondage, or our rights in the districts, or by whatever other name it may be called ” bespeaking some of the possible causes of the war. Slavery was a major factor that led to the war. The South had legion demands for free and easy labour this was because of the figure of plantations in the part. The Deep South had vast of plantations and were the major beginning of struggle since they needed slaves to work in those farms. States in the upper south portion such as North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, and Arkansas besides known as the Border States had smaller plantations and were subsequently forced to fall in the Confederate States of America during the Fort Sumter crisis ( Watkins, p.52 ) .

The proportion of households that owned plantation in the South was really big where about half of the per centum was owned by households in the Deep South. The figure of slaves needed to supply inexpensive labour in the farms was besides proportionally equal to the size of farms owned. Slave trade had started earlier where slaves from African descent were sold for inexpensive labour at the plantations. The population was besides imbalanced with bulk of the African Americans life in the South. The impression that slaves had no rights and were inferior to their proprietors caused a batch of call, there was besides a impression that the white adult male was superior and demanded regard from the black adult male ( Mcdonough, p.46 ) .

The prohibition on bondage in the North besides aggravated the issues more since the South had to utilize the slaves. The Acts of the Apostless of Congress directed that no 1 was allowed to keep or ain slaves in the northern district. This resulted to a immense divide between the North and South since it was declared illegal in the North and practiced in the South. The so incumbent president Lincoln treated bondage with precedence and was determined to stop it in the United States ( Romaneck, & A ; Romaneck, p.71 ) . The republicans who controlled the North and the democrats commanding the South were divided and it subsequently became a political issue for the control of districts.

The Whites from the South needed bondage to go on and they saw get rid ofing of bondage as a political competition ; their frights were based on immense economic losingss that would be got by the release of the slaves and besides racial rights and equality. The contention was that inkinesss were inferior and were to be slaves for the white adult male and the inkinesss that were free would ne’er be allowed to populate together with the Whites ( Romaneck, & A ; Romaneck, p.127 ) . Other saw it that the North wanted to undermine the South in stoping bondage and increasing the black and white ratio in the South ; this would increase poorness and higher offense in the South.

The looming war had started manner back in 1830s when no mail that carried slavery abolishment messages was allowed to the South ; besides no instruction or literature on abolishment was allowed. This led to the struggle of involvements and values between the two parts ( Eicher, p.58 ) . In the 1850s slaves began traveling from Border States either through flight, sale, or manumission and most became free in the Border States and the Deep South saw this as a major menace. The slaves besides ended up being dearly-won and were owned by a little per centum of the affluent households in the Deep South.

The southern politicians saw this as a agency for the republicans to bring on the South to contend within itself and command the power of the South in that it would motivate the African Americans and anti bondage Whites to come against those practicing bondage and therefore led to civil war and as Watkins, p.81 puts it “ We merely fought for our State rights, they for Union and power. The South fell combating under the streamer of State rights, but yet expansive and glorious even in decease ” .

Economic and societal differences

Sectionalism was another cause for the American civil war ; this was because of the disparities found between the North and the South. The economic systems, imposts, societal construction and political involvements and values between the South and North were all based on different principals ( Eicher, p.62 ) . The South was still in favour of the old traditional values of inequality and segregation while the North had moved on to a newer dispensation. The North were economically good placed than the north and the South needed to utilize the inexpensive labour to be economically the same as the North but this conflicted with the values of the politician in the North. The North had besides industrialized and urbanised and therefore there was no demand for slaves whereas the South had acquired better farms for agribusiness and therefore needed inexpensive labour to go on working. The diminution of slaves in the Border States triggered ill will in the south ground forces since they were a major economic issue and the slaves were expensive ( Watkins, p.81 ) .

Watkins, p.123 provinces “ Negro belongings all of a sudden became really valuable, and there was raised the ululation of “ rich adult male ‘s war, hapless adult male ‘s fight. ” ” . This issue besides impacted on the faiths for illustration the Presbyterian had to divide in to the North and South. The south feared that the slaves would be incited by the North and rebellion against their Masterss and this initiated the war between the economically rich, industrialised and urbanised North and the rural, agribusiness based, non-industrial South ( Eicher, p.90 ) .

State Rights vs. federal rights

Each province had its ain rights. Equally long as the rights of the provinces were different at that place would be struggle when citizens move between provinces or shifted to other provinces. The rights ne’er applied when a citizen was in another province and therefore those in the South feared fring their belongings such as slaves when the moved to provinces that did non pattern bondage ( Mcdonough, p.77 ) . The North on the other manus ne’er allowed bondage since it contravened their values and rule. This struggle of involvement could merely take to a civil war that was initiated by the south since they saw themselves as the also-rans.

Loyalty and Honor

Loyalty was a major facet in both parts this led to nationality and award for all those who remained loyal to the state ‘s class. The voluntaries who fought during the war were all loyal to their provinces. The trueness ne’er gave a opportunity for dialogue since they saw each other as enemies with a different class which was already predetermined by their leaders. Watkins, p.146 decidedly says “ They are the posterities of the good old Puritan Plymouth Rock stock, and we of the South from the proud and blue stock of Cavaliers. We believe in the philosophy of State rights, they in the philosophy of centralisation ” ( Watkins, p.159 )

Lincoln ‘s Election

Lincoln was seen as an enemy of the south due to his legion attempts to stop bondage. His election in 1860 merely aggravated the south to take action to forestall him from stoping it and take to a sequence of the South ( Romaneck, & A ; Romaneck, p.71 ) . This was nevertheless non to be since the war initiated was won by the North. In decision the American civil war was fought for all the incorrect grounds and better apprehension and dialogue would hold saved the guiltless lives that were lost during the war.

Work Cited:

Eicher, David J. The Civil War in books: an analytical bibliography. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1997

Mcdonough, James L. Stones River Bloody Winter Tennessee. Volunteer state: Univ. of Tennessee Press, 1983

Romaneck, Greg M. & A ; Romaneck, Erin E. Civil War Narratives: Narratives of Everyday Soldiers and Civilians, Volume 1. California: Heritage Books, 2008

Watkins, Sam R. Co. Aytch: A Confederate Memoir of the Civil War. New York: Simon & A ; Schuster, 2003